Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Dike v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vickie Diane Dike
Defendant:
David Knight, Trey English, Heather McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomason
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Jailer David Knight, Nurse Kristy and Deputy Jailer Jennifer Bounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Heather Stewart
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail, David Knight, Nurse Kristy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Osborne et al v. Harmon et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Osborne and Class Members
Defendant:
Jailer Stephan Harmon, Melissa Wathen, Bruce Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knights v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Michael Lawrence Knights
Respondent:
Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture - Exploitation of Children
Mitchell v. Knight et al
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight and Correction Officer Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Phelps et al
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dianne Thacker
Defendant:
Jody Phelps, Shauna, Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
