Cases 1 - 10 of 39
FERRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
PERCIVAL CHARLES FERRIS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERRIS v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2023cv24017
Plaintiff:
PERCIVAL CHARLES FERRIS, JR
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY D DIXON, T KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. FORRESTER-TROUPE et al
as 3:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
KENA FORRESTER-TROUPE, LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, KRISTAL AKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv09879
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL D GREEN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and T KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 3:2022cv18500
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JOHNSON JR and ALBERT JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
K KNIGHT and L HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 3:2022cv17329
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM KNIGHT
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
PAUL EMMANUEL KNIGHT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00295
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
KENNETH DEAN KNIGHT, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDERSON v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2021cv00080
Defendant:
MAINTENCE SUPERVISOR, ADMINISTRATION SECURITY WARDEN, PETERSON and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEAVY v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2020cv05842
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, THOMPSON, ARAMARK/KEEFE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDRE PEAVY and MIKHAIL IMAN MUSTAQIM AL-QUADI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
