Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ADKINS et al v. RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20743
Plaintiff: MILLARD ADKINS, ROSALYN ANDERSON, ELI ERLICK and others
Defendant: RECKITT BENCKISER PHARMACEUTICALS INC., THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
EATON et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff: GERALD LEE EATON and NANCY P. EATON
Defendant: MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 1:2019md02875
Defendant: TEVA INDUSTRIES LTD., HETERO USA INC., CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Plaintiff: DOMINIC STIMMA, JYNONA GAIL LEE, MARGOTH STRAND and others
In Re: VALSARTAN N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE (NDMA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv18338
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDERSON
Defendant: ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HUAHAI U.S. INC., PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL, CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv12243
Plaintiff: BILLY GRAY
Defendant: ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL, CO., LTD., LEGACY PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING, LLC, PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNIGHT v. HETERO LABS LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv06383
Plaintiff: GLORIA KNIGHT
Defendant: HETERO LABS LTD., THE KROGER CO., JOHN DOE and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEGLOVICH v. HETERO DRUGS, LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv01903
Defendant: JUBILANT GENERICS, LTD., SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES LTD, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff: Estate of Donna Keglovich and DONNA KEGLOVICH
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keglovich v. HETERO DRUGS LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv01901
Defendant: RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATON, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff: Estate of Donna Keglovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?