Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Caradimitropoulo v. Kruse
as 2:2023cv03969
Plaintiff:
Mike Caradimitropoulo
Defendant:
Richard F. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kruse v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Steven Kruse
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kruse v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01962
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kruse v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2020op45277
Defendant:
H.D. SMITH HOLDINGS, LLC., McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kruse v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20270
Plaintiff:
Kathie J. Kruse
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Kruse
as 1:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
Danita P. Brown
Defendant:
Autumn Kruse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Beyoglides v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Harry G Beyoglides, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff, NaphCare, Inc., Ted Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. New Technology Steel Company et al
as 3:2008cv02411
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Robinson
Defendant:
New Technology Steel Company, John Moran, Charles Kruse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prey v. Kruse et al
as 2:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Prey
Defendant:
Tammy R. Kruse, Robert Kruse and John Does #3 - #10
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
