Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Providence Regional Medical Center Everett et al v. Cochran
as 2:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
MultiCare Health System, Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center Torrance, Valley Medical Center and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01600
Plaintiff:
HARTFORD HOSPITAL, SKAGIT VALLEY HOSPITAL, MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORE and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
PROVIDENCE SAINT PETER HOSPITAL et al v. ALEX M. AZAR II
as 1:2019cv01363
Plaintiff:
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, BANNER - UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH CAMPUS, PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY MEDICAL CENTER TORRANCE and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
OROVILLE HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv01594
Plaintiff:
OROVILLE HOSPITAL , PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER , WILLIAM W. BACKUS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Verdant Health Commission et al v. Sebelius
as 3:2014cv05108
Plaintiff:
Verdant Health Commission , Providence Health & Services-Washington , Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2014cv05107
Plaintiff:
Stevens Healthcare, Providence Health & Services - Washington, Providence Health & Services - Washington d/b/a Providence Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
