Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
as 23-7144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and others
Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
as 23-7120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and others
Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
as 23-7034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III and Matthew G. Kaiser
Larry Klayman v. Matthew Kaiser, et al
as 23-7020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew G. Kaiser, Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
as 22-7123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and others
Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
as 22-7094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and others
KLAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX III and MATTHEW KAISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv03017
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. TSPMG - THE SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv02939
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
TSPMG - THE SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
