Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Blake et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Cleaver-Brooks Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Soco-West Inc., Trane US Inc., American Honda Motor Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Blake, Rufus Blake and Michael Blake
Cross Claimant:
Advance Auto Parts Inc., Boeing Co., Eaton Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
FMC Corporation, General Electric Company and Mannington Mills Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Davis et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harry A. Davis and Madonna S. Davis
Cross Defendant:
Peerless Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Baldonado et al v. Arvinmeritor Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor Inc., BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CNH America LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Paccar Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Baldonado and Virginia Baldonado
Cross Claimant:
CNH Industrial America LLC (fka CNH America LLC), IMO Industries Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Murray et al v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Murray and Marlyn Carrothers
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Marlyn Carrothers and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. , Trane US Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bond et al v. American Biltrite Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01340
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation, Georgia Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bond and Ann Bond
Cross Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Pneumo Abex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Johnson et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Ruby Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
White et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01085
Plaintiff:
Cynthia White , Rose White and Jimmy George White
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company and Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
