Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Trumbly v. Heimgardner et al
as 5:2011cv03185
Petitioner:
Mikel E. Trumbly
Respondent:
James Heimgardner, Kansas Parole Board and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Metcalfe v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2011cv03148
Petitioner:
Hercules C. Metcalfe
Respondent:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2011cv03140
Petitioner:
Jessie D. Hughes
Respondent:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Jordan, et al
as 11-3072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHASE CORBIN COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DON JORDAN, Secretary, Kansas Department of SRS, in his official capacity and KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cavaness v. Roberts, et al
as 10-3316
Petitioner - Appellant:
KYLE CAVANESS
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Pabst v. McKune, et al
as 10-3256
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOD A. PABST
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEPHEN SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Anderson v. Cline, et al
as 10-3166
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE RAY ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SAM CLINE, Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility and STEVE N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2010cv03117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Karen S. Rohling, Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Jordan et al
as 5:2010cv03109
Plaintiff:
Chase Corbin Collins
Defendant:
Don Jordan and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Roberts, et al
as 10-3018
Petitioner - Appellant:
AKIRA T. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and STEVEN SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
