Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Diaz v. High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Diaz
Defendant:
High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration, Kansas City Missouri Drug Enforcement Agency, Kansas City Missouri Division of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2012cv01470
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Montgomery
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department and Lafayette County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Clemmons v. City of Kansas City, Missouri, et al
as 12-2959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward L. Clemmons
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department, Det. Warren Miller, Det. Thomas Marquist and others
Johnson v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department
as 4:2011cv01095
Petitioner:
Michael L Johnson
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richardson v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
Finis V Richardson
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department and Vonwolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor vs. Crum, et al.
as 4:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Rayshawn T. Taylor
Defendant:
Clinton Crum, Markus Davis, Kansas City, Missouri Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzwater v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Fitzwater
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Steven Bloch, Jerry Grubb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Harris
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Wayne W Jones, Rick Ropka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
