Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Coleman v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2015cv02064
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel A Coleman
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brunner v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2015cv00468
Plaintiff:
David Brunner
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Matthew Brazeal and Mark Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Matzke et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2015cv03279
Plaintiff:
Colleen Melburn Matzke and Elray Matzke
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
George Steven Wallace
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vega v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Antonio Vega
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regalado v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Miguel Regalado
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Carrejo v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 5:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Frank Carrejo
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Lance Nelson
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Barnes et al v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Eloise Barnes and Willie Gonzales
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grigsby v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Mark Grigsby
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
