Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Spight v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2020cv03081
Defendant:
Kansas Parole Board, James Heimgartner and Michelle Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spight v. Hemigartner et al
as 1:2020cv01677
Defendant:
Kansas Parole Board, James Hemigartner and Michelle Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Maier (ID 104561) v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv03196
Defendant:
Enforcement, Apprehension and Investigation, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Langford et al
as 5:2017cv03144
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado and Kishen Leroy Woods
Respondent:
Don Langford, L. Stanley, Rural Larned Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parrish-Parrado v. Waddington, et al
as 15-3176
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH-PARRADO
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG WADDINGTON, LARNED CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, KANSAS PAROLE BOARD, AKA Prison Review Board and others
Parrish-Parrado v. Waddington et al
as 5:2014cv03178
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Respondent:
Doug Waddington, David Ferris, Larned Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3139
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Heath v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3081
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENN A. HEATH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, PATRICIA BIGGS, MIKE O'NIEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
