Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Adams v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2014cv00457
Plaintiff:
Karen Adams
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Riggs, et al v. San Juan County, et al
as 14-4003
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PENN, CANDACE LAWS, PAUL KEITH and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE LYMAN, HELEN VALDEZ, DONNA SINGER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN JUAN COUNTY, SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT, J. TYRON LEWIS, Commissioner and others
Defendant:
UTAH STATE BAR, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, BILLY WALKER, BARBARA TOWNSEND and others
Attorney - Appellant:
SUSAN ROSE
MacArthur, et al v. San Juan County, et al
as 08-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALISON DICKSON, DONNA SINGER and FRED RIGGS
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LYMAN, HELEN VALDEZ, STEVEN MACARTHUR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN JUAN COUNTY, SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT, J. TYRON LEWIS, Commissioner and others
Lyman, et al v. San Juan County, et al
as 07-4267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE LYMAN and HELEN VALDEZ
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MACARTHUR, NATHANIEL PENN, CANDACE LAWS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SAN JUAN COUNTY, SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT, J. TYRON LEWIS, Commissioner and others
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MacArthur, et al v. San Juan County, et al
as 05-4310
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MACARTHUR, NATHANIEL PENN, MICHELLE LYMAN and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDA CACAPARDO, SUE BURTON, AMY TERLAAK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SAN JUAN COUNTY, SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT, J. TYRON LEWIS, Commissioner and others
Defendant:
ST. PAUL'S INSURANCE, LYN STEVENS, San Juan County Commissioner, MANUAL MORGAN, San Juan County Commissioner and others
Defendant - Movant:
TRUCK INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.