Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martin v. Purdue et al
as 1:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Sonny Purdue, Karen Handel and Tanja D. Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales v. Handel
as 1:2008cv03172
Plaintiff:
Jose Morales, Jose Morales, Jose Morales and others
Defendant:
Karen Handel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Action to enforce 26th amendment right to vote
Dean v. Hatten et al
as 1:2008cv02153
Plaintiff:
G. Thomas Dean
Defendant:
James N. Hatten, Julie E. Carnes, Sharon Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Dean v. Handel et al
as 1:2008cv02129
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Dean
Defendant:
Karen Handel, The Supreme Court of State of Georgia, The Georgia Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv02880
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007mi00338
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. Billups et al
as 4:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bertha B Young, Bertha B Young, Bertha B Young and others
Defendant:
Evon Billups, Tracy Brown, Gary Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
