Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Caenen v. Rohling
as 5:2008cv03118
Petitioner: Arthur J Caenen, Jr
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS, ROBERT WILLESDEN and (FNU) BAGBY
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3105
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, RO BOESE, Correctional Officer, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, (FNU) MCFESSELL and others
Hunt v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv03087
Plaintiff: Jeff Hunt
Defendant: Kansas Department of Corrections, Gloria Geither and Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3055
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS, ROBERT WILLESDEN and (FNU) BAGBY
Shriner v. Rohlings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant: EARL K. SHRINER
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Luton v. Rohling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv03054
Petitioner: John D Luton
Respondent: Karen Rohling and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03049
Plaintiff: Larece T Hutton
Defendant: Karen Rohling, Ro Boese, (fnu) McFessell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03034
Plaintiff: Terrell Hutton
Defendant: Karen Rohling, Robert Willesden and (fnu) Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Rohling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv03027
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?