Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE CO. v. MICHEL et al
as 1:2023cv01668
Plaintiff:
GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY and GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
MICHEL OLNER, Carexpresso LLC, JB HUNT TRANSPORT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
United States v. Carter
as 20-3042
Appellant:
JAMES A. BROWN
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 20-3039
Not Yet Classified:
DAVID R. COHEN, Special Master
Appellant:
SHERI CATANIA
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 20-3040
Appellant:
KIM I. FLANNIGAN
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Not Yet Classified:
DAVID R. COHEN, Special Master
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 20-3041
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Appellant:
SCOTT C. RASK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 20-3043
Appellant:
TERRA D. MOREHEAD
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 20-3038
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellant:
DAVID PAXTON ZABEL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 19-3205
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHERI CATANIA, Esq.
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 19-3201
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT C. RASK
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 19-3199
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PAXTON ZABEL
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
