Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Zankl et al v. Spin Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04243
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Zankl, Kristin Zankl, Karma of Palm Beach, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Spin Capital, LLC, Hi Bar Capital, LLC, Avrum (Josh) Lubin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zankl et al v. Spin Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Zankl, Kristin Zankl, Karma of Palm Beach, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Spin Capital, LLC, Hi Bar Capital, LLC, Avrum (Josh) Lubin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zankl et al v. Spin Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Zankl, Karma of Palm Beach, Inc., Karma of Broward, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Spin Capital, LLC, Hi Bar Capital, LLC, Avrum Lubin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sonam v. Donahue
as 1:2021cv07004
Petitioner:
Karma Sonam
Respondent:
Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Karma Culture, LLC v. Clarkson
as 6:2019cv06775
Defendant:
Aron Joseph Clarkson
Plaintiff:
Karma Culture, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Magee v. American Express et al
as 1:2019cv08476
Plaintiff:
Quincy Magee
Defendant:
The City of New York, Equifax, TransUnion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05699
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Maxim Inc. v. Karma International, LLC
as 1:2019cv04582
Defendant:
Maxim, Inc and KARMA INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
