Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02460
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KARNES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01988
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
TIANJIAO KARNES
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
CALUMET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv03798
Plaintiff:
CALUMET MONTANA REFINING, LLC, CALUMET REFINING, LLC, CALUMET PRINCETON REFINING, LLC and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. v. KARN CHARUHAS CHAPMAN & TWOHEY PC
as 1:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
KARN CHARUHAS CHAPMAN & TWOHEY PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY K.S.C. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2014cv01064
Plaintiff:
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY K.S.C. , AGILITY DGS LOGISTICS SERVICES K.S.C.C. and PWC TRANSPORT COMPANY W.L.L.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, STEPHEN W. PRESTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United Government Security, et al v. United States Marshals, et al
as 12-5306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United Government Security Officers of America International Union
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ann J. Barkley, Don E. Kemp, Keith Morris and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Marshals Service, by and through Director John Clark and any successor, Akal Security, Inc., MVM, Inc. and others
DAIGLE v. KARNES
as 1:2010cv01264
Petitioner:
RALPH LEO DAIGLE
Respondent:
JAMES A. KARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
