Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Elena Nacarino, et al v. Kashi Company
as 22-15377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELENA NACARINO and MEGAN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
KASHI COMPANY
Nacarino et al v. Kashi Company
as 3:2021cv07036
Plaintiff:
Elena Nacarino and Megan Taylor
Defendant:
Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patrick Sweeney v. Kellogg Company, et al
as 16-10854
Interested Party - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLOGG COMPANY and THE KASHI COMPANY
:
LAURA EGGNATZ, a.k.a. Laura Gabbamonte and KATRINA GARCIA, Miami-Dade County, Miami, FL
Hun et al v. Kashi Company
as 1:2015cv01391
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hun and Dana Paul
Defendant:
Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Skye Astiana, et al v. Kashi Company
as 13-80180
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SKYE ASTIANA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MILAN BABIC, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY BOLICK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
KASHI COMPANY, a California corporation
Astiana et al v. Kashi Company et al
as 1:2013mc00517
Plaintiff:
Skye Astiana, Milan Babic, Rosaclaire Baisinger and others
Respondent:
Skye Astiana
Defendant:
Bear Naked, Inc., David Denholm, David Desouza and others
Movant:
Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Norwood v. Kashi Company
as 3:2013cv00956
Plaintiff:
Denelda Norwood
Defendant:
Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burns v. Kashi Company
as 3:2013cv00959
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Burns
Defendant:
Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saubers v. Kashi Company
as 3:2013cv00899
Plaintiff:
Nadine Saubers
Defendant:
Kashi Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PEREL et al v. KASHI COMPANY
as 2:2013cv02369
Plaintiff:
WENDY PEREL and LESLIE SARAKIN
Defendant:
KASHI COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
