Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Petersen et al v. Virk Transline et al
as 2:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Shauna Petersen and Michael Petersen
Defendant:
Virk Transline and Kashmir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Ross et al v. AD Haulers, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ross and Solomon Cave
Defendant:
AD Haulers, Inc. and Kashmir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv08066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh et al v. Bhatia et al
as 4:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kanwaljit Singh , Jarnail Singh , Harjit Singh and others
Defendant:
Sardar Gurmit Bhatia, Sardar Rupinder Singh, Members of Management Committee of Sikh Center Houston of Gulf Coast Area, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Harvinder Singh , Sampuran Singh , Bhupinder Singh and others
Intervenor_defendant:
S. Kamaljit Singh Mann , S. Mukhtiar Singh , S. Kashmir Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kashmir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72528
Petitioner:
KASHMIR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Kashmir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70849
Petitioner:
KASHMIR SINGH, AKA Surjit Singh
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Kashmir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70606
Petitioner:
KASHMIR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Kashmir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70376
Petitioner:
KASHMIR SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
