Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kiger v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv04235
Plaintiff:
Greg Kiger
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, James Dimas, Gregg Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv04233
Plaintiff:
Dothan K. Rogers
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, James Dimas, Gregg Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04213
Plaintiff:
Robert L Warren
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtner v Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04203
Plaintiff:
Troy A Curtner
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulder v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04162
Plaintiff:
Michael Mulder
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04163
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warden v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04154
Plaintiff:
Timothy Warden
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04157
Plaintiff:
Danny Walker
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargett v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04159
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Hargett
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northcutt v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04156
Plaintiff:
Curt Northcutt
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
