Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Doherty v. Colvin et al
as 2:2013cv00804
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Doherty
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Morris et al
as 2:2012cv01125
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company , Eli Holmes and Kenyatta Kirwan Hudson
Defendant:
Teresa Morris, Shulunda Dumas, Shana Hice and others
Counter_claimant:
Terri Catrett Maurer
Counter_defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company , Eli Holmes and Kenyatta Kirwan Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Progressive Speciality Insurance Company v. Hanson et al
as 2:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Progressive Speciality Insurance Company
Defendant:
Billy Joe Hanson, Kathleen Sebelius , Montgomery Pulmonary Consultants, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Holistic Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 1:2011cv01129
Plaintiff:
Holistic Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Ragan v. Sebelius et al
as 2:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Ragan
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , Center for Medicare Services, Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Garland et al
as 2:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sandra Garland , Marianna Radiology, Southern Bone & Joint Specialist and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Michelle Parkin
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sandra Garland
Counter_claimant:
Sandra Garland
Counter_defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Rogers et al
as 3:2009cv00911
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda Rogers, Kathleen Sebelius, Alabama Medicaid Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
