Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. HAMBURG, et al
as 1:2014cv02479
Plaintiff: Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant: MARGARET A. HAMBURG , United States Food And Drug Administration , Kathleen Sebelius and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00858
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flint River Hospice Inc v. Sebelius
as 1:2013cv00042
Plaintiff: Flint River Hospice Inc
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta et al v. Sebelius et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03489
Plaintiff: The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta , The Most Reverend Wilton D. Gregory , Christ the King Catholic School and others
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Hilda Solis, Timothy Geithner and others
Herbert v. Sebelius
as 1:2012cv00992
Plaintiff: Christie Y. Herbert
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04403
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02760
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scientech Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2011cv01943
Plaintiff: Scientech Medical Supplies, Inc.
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Sally Quillian Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Boggs v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00031
Plaintiff: Kentae Andre Boggs
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Angels of Hope, LLC v. Sebelius
as 3:2011cv00016
Plaintiff: Angels of Hope, LLC
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?