Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Yuan v. Dermira, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00848
Defendant: Thomas G. Wiggans, Matthew Fust, Dermira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Changxia Yuan
Schneider v. Dermira, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00663
Defendant: Thomas G. Wiggans, Matthew Fust, Dermira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Schneider
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09734
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. Affordable Care Act-The Market Place et al
as 1:2014cv04648
Plaintiff: Edward M. Harris
Defendant: Affordable Care Act-The Market Place and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratcliff et al v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv03680
Plaintiff: Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant: Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ratcliff v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv02704
Plaintiff: Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant: Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lenox Hill Hospital v. Sebelius
as 1:2013cv05231
Plaintiff: Lenox Hill Hospital
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Berman v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv04513
Plaintiff: Sonia Berman
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Valentine v. U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers Comp Program et al
as 1:2011cv07241
Plaintiff: Michelle Valentine
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers Comp Program, Kathleen Sebelius and Irving B. Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?