Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TATE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01342
Petitioner:
KATIE B. TATE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROBINSON et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
KATIE ROBINSON and CRAIG DESTEIGUER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WESTSIDE CHURCH OF CRHIST v. USA
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
WESTSIDE CHURCH OF CRHIST Katy, Texas doing business as CINCO RANCH CHURCH OF CHRIST
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
TRIUMPH CS HOLDINGS, LLC, ROGER LEROY STOESZ, GCC INTERESTS, LLC doing business as MR. C'S BOAT & RV STORAGE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BLACK et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
DONNA LOESCH BLACK, JOSEPH H. BLADES, KATIE S. BLADES and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PENDLETON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00454
Petitioner:
KATIE PENDLETON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
KATHARINE JANE THOMPSON and KATIE JANE THOMPSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Anderson v. US
as 21-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERRY DIANE BRANDON HOLLOMAN, JUNIOR MORGAN, APALA D. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER SANCHEZ, DOE NO. 3, LOVIE LEE STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
LAMARE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00312
Petitioner:
KATIE LAMARE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012vv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
