Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kaufman v. Debottis
as 9:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman and Kenneth W. Kaufman
Defendant:
Debottis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Syracuse Justice Center, Jamesville Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FanFan v. M.C.C. et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Defendant:
MLP Y Joaquin, MD. Robert Beaudouin, Dr. Daniel Kaufman and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy FanFan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2020cv02144
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe, Yaphank Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell A. Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antrobus v. George et al
as 1:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
Andre Antrobus
Defendant:
George, Guiterez, Kaufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Gerry Haynes
Defendant:
Captain Ramirez, Lieutenant Katz, Sergeant Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Sheriff Deputy D. Kaufman, et al
as 1:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
Juan Quinones Rivera
Defendant:
Sheriff Deputy D. Kaufman, John Rodriguez, Thomas Diina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murdock v. Legal Aid Society, et al
as 2:2014cv00508
Defendant:
Assigned Counsel Defenders Plan of Nassau County, Cindy D'Ambra, Devane and Groder and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Murdock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Huttel et al
as 1:2013cv00599
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
D. Huttel, Robert Ercole, R. Arrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Huttel et al
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Latee Robinson
Defendant:
D. Huttel, Robert Ercole, R. Arrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
