Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis Kaufman v. Greene County, Ohio Miami Valley Juvenile Rehabilitation Center
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Shannon Davis Kaufman
Defendant:
Miami Valley Juvenile Rehabilitation Center and Greene County, Ohio Miami Valley Juvenile Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Matsa v. The State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv02662
Plaintiff:
Eleftheria Matsa
Defendant:
The State Of Ohio, The Ohio Board of Regents, The Choose Ohio First Program and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Kaufman v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kaufman
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaufman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01130
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stuart Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Splaine v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv00203
Defendant:
David P. King, Colleen F. Arnold, Gregory B. Kenny and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Splaine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gorrie v. 801 Polaris, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00911
Defendant:
801 Polaris, LLC, Bradley S. Slomsky and Kaufman, LLC
Plaintiff:
Steve Wesley Gorrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kaufman v. AVI Food Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00755
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kaufman
Defendant:
AVI Food Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Thomas v. Columbus, City of et al
as 2:2014cv00906
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Columbus, City of , Kimberley Jacobs and William T. Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaufman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00291
Petitioner:
Emily C Kaufman
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
