Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Gigena v. Sexton, et al.
as 24-1218
Plaintiff: GABRIEL GIGENA
Defendant: ANDREA SEXTON, PATRICK M. KEENE, ADAM ALLEN and others
Douglas Raymond Aggio Keen v. Marissa Whitney Bowley
as 8:2023cv02333
Petitioner: Douglas Raymond Aggio Keen
Respondent: Marissa Whitney Bowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
In re Naturalization Ceremony 9/13/2023
as 3:2023mc80224
In Re: Naturalization Ceremony, Oleksandra Boiko Acosta, Neftaly de Jesus Aguilar Rodriguez and others
Le'Ondre Walker v. Jhon Keen, et al
as 21-17045
Plaintiff / Appellant: LE'ONDRE WALKER
Defendant / Appellee: JHON KEEN, NANCY E. O'MALLEY, District Attorney, DAVID HAUBERT and others
Lamont Karriem v. County of Riverside, et al
as 21-56180
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside, SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, County of Riverside and others
Keen Smith, Jr. v. DPS, et al
as 21-35835
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEEN L.A. SMITH, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, ALASKA COURT SYSTEM and others
Keen Smith, Jr. v. Palmer Courthouse, et al
as 21-35721
Petitioner / Appellant: KEEN L.A. SMITH, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: PALMER COURTHOUSE and GOOSE CREEK CORRECTIONAL CENTER
CIR v. Ritchie Stevens, et al
as 21-71082
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner: JULIE A. KEENE-STEVENS and RITCHIE N. STEVENS
Ritchie Stevens, et al v. CIR
as 21-70650
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIE A. KEENE-STEVENS and RITCHIE N. STEVENS
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?