Cases 1 - 10 of 39
G & L Decor, Inc. v. Cadence Keen Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
G & L Decor, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadence Keen Innovations, Inc. and Sam Montross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Essenmacher v. Keene Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael Essenmacher
Cross Defendant:
Keene Carriers, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Trion Solutions I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rondevoo Technologies, LLC v. Keen Eye, LLC
as 1:2019cv06617
Plaintiff:
Rondevoo Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Keen Eye, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lopez v. Foot Locker Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01271
Defendant:
Sneak EZ, LLC, Grand Cutters Barber Shop, Inc., Akamai Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Balarezo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11911
Plaintiff:
Demetrios Kaloudakis, Patrick Keane, Anthony Barzelatto and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
