Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Keener v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
Eilene Keener
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv17099
Plaintiff:
Eilene M. Keener and Ezequiel Ramirez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13556
Plaintiff:
Christina Keener
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12212
Plaintiff:
Shana Keener and Jeramy Keener
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv08421
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Keener and John Keener
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33671
Plaintiff:
Teresa Keener
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23375
Plaintiff:
Etta Nyoka Keener and Charles R. Keener
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keener v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21701
Plaintiff:
Lorene Keener
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sparks v. 4520 Corp., Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14276
Cross Defendant:
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, Joy Technologies, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Townsend & Bottum, Inc., Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oglebay Norton Company and others
Plaintiff:
Victor W. Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Keener v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02822
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Keener
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
