Cases 1 - 7 of 7
California, State of v. Hitachi Astemo, Ltd et al
as 2:2023cv13077
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
Hitachi Astemo, Ltd. (f/k/a Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd), Hitachi Astemo Indiana, Inc. (f/k/a Keihin North America, Inc.), Hitachi Astemo, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HITACHI ASTEMO INDIANA, INC v. XPO LOGISTICS, LLC
as 1:2020cv01345
Plaintiff:
Keihin North America, Inc. and HITACHI ASTEMO INDIANA, INC.
Defendant:
XPO Logistics LLC
Counter Claimant:
XPO LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VITEC, L.L.C. v. Keihin Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv12858
Defendant:
Mikuni American Corporation, Mikuni Corporation, Maruyasu Industries Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
VITEC, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Irving Levine Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. Aisan Industry Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv13423
Plaintiff:
Irving Levine Automotive Distributors, Inc.
Defendant:
Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., Franklin Precision Industry, Inc., Aisan Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Fuel Injection System - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2013cv02201
Plaintiff:
All European Auto Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., Aisan Corporation of America, Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
All European Auto Supply, Inc. v. Aisan Industry Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv11827
Plaintiff:
All European Auto Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., Aisan Corporation of America, Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. and others
Rainbow Chevrolet, Inc., et al. v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., et al.
as 2:2015cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rainbow Chevrolet, Inc. and Stoebner Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
