Cases 1 - 10 of 549
Perry v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Keith Perry
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lockett v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Keith Lockett
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Association of American Railroads v. Jacobson et al
as 0:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads
Defendant:
Bob Jacobson, Paul Marquart and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mangum v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv01505
Petitioner:
Leonard Mangum
Respondent:
Tracy Beltz and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guevara v. Margoles et al
as 0:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Michelle Margoles, Laura Provinzino, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
William Keith
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
King v. Belinger et al
as 0:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Belinger, MD.O.C. and Keith Ellingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, The et al
as 0:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant:
The State of Minnesota For The Actions David S. Doty, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Whitehead
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
