Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Jefferson v. Cooley
as 2:2023cv02983
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Jefferson
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimble v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Raymond H Kimble, III
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Brent Thompson, J Pelican and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones vs. Cooley
as 2:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jones and Tryone Jones
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledet v. Cooley
as 5:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Darval Ledet
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Cooley
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Pittman
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Cooley
as 2:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spivey v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Deshan Spivey
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Brent Thompson, James Lablanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cooley
as 5:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Pittman
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Krystle Simon, Ricky Kennon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley
as 6:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
