Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DiPierro et al v. New York State Unified Court System et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Paul DiPierro and Marie Zweig
Defendant:
New York State Unified Court System, New York Office of Court Administration, Justin Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mora v. New York State Unified Court System et al
as 7:2022cv10322
Plaintiff:
Frank Mora
Defendant:
New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration, Anne Minihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gilbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10448
Plaintiff:
James Gilbert, Edward Goodyear, Roger Gossett and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Ottey et al v. United States of America Department of Treasury et al
as 1:2019cv01392
Plaintiff:
Grier Bowen, Nailah Fernandes, Abraham Jomo Jawara and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Yang, Nancy T. Sunshine, Gregory Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv01854
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Keith Miller
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Emory v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01103
Plaintiff:
Nolan Emory
Defendant:
The City of New York, P.O. Keith Miller, P.O. John Does 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pierre v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05070
Defendant:
P.O. JOHN DOE 1-2, The City of New York, Jeffrey Taszymowicz and others
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. The City of New York
as 1:2009cv06817
Plaintiff:
Keith Miller
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
