Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Pooler Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
John A. Doyle
Defendant:
Pooler Police Department, Pat Doherty, Amanda Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Doyle
Defendant:
Amanda Kelley, Patrick Doherty and Corey Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atum-Rayay v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Joe Roesch, Tammie Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
RaHarrakte Sahu Atum-Rayay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. ODUM et al
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALAN ODUM, ASHLEIGH D HEADRICK, SAMUEL S OLENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
