Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Mims
as 1:2023cv02734
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. GDC Mental Health Department et al
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. McKinney, James Ligon, Jr., George Kelley and others
Defendant:
GDC Mental Health Department, Timothy C. Ward and Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Frank D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
KELLEY v. WARD
as 2:2021cv00269
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL KELLEY
Respondent:
Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLEY v. WARD
as 4:2021cv00211
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL KELLEY
Respondent:
TIMOTHY WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doyle v. Pooler Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Plaintiff:
John A. Doyle
Defendant:
Pooler Police Department, Pat Doherty, Amanda Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
