Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Palmer and Richard Palmer
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Kelley Christopher, Dr. Timothy Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. C.M.C.F. Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Pruitt
Defendant:
C.M.C.F. Staff, Mississippi, C/O Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddy v. Mandy et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Eddy
Defendant:
Unknown Mandy and Unknown Kelley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. USA
as 1:2019cv00169
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Doris Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelley v. USA
as 3:2019cv00027
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel George Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Patton v. Kelley
as 3:2018cv00690
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Frank Demetrious Patton
Defendant:
Darla Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. USA
as 3:2018cv00670
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel George Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelley v. Chapman et al
as 3:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Unknown Chapman and Management & Training Corp., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
