Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BRAYBOY v. KULLNER et al
as 2:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
KULLNER, ZACHARY J. MOSLACK, DAYNORWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Donnell v. Lamas et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
KELLEY O'DONNELL
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF (PENNSYLVANIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'DONNELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04126
Plaintiff:
KELLY O'DONNELL, ANGELA BONNANO-RICHTER and KELLEY O'DONNELL
Defendant:
DANIEL R. STEVENSON, THURGOOD MATTHEWS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2019cv04801
Defendant:
TOM ROWLANDS, TRISH KELLEY, ANGELINA MURRAY and others
Plaintiff:
EMMETT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORREST v. BEDELL et al
as 2:2019cv04204
Defendant:
DR. MOCLOCK, TONER, TRISHA KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04182
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE DANIEL O'MALLEY, NURSE TONI SEAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, KELLY HARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. HARRELL et al
as 2:2017cv05603
Plaintiff:
IRVIN HARPER
Defendant:
KELLY HARRELL, LARRY KRASNER, DANIAL OMALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2015cv04472
Plaintiff:
LIONEL S. LAWRENCE, SR.
Defendant:
VINCENT MOONEY, TRISHA KELLEY, THERESE JELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Defendant:
VINCENT MOONEY, LINDA CHISMAR, JENNIFER SHAUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
