Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Montana v. Wilborn et al
as 3:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Shahid Ahmad Montana, Jr
Defendant:
George Wilborn, Kelly Rhodes, Dr Chandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00543
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael P Randle, Roger E Walker, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC et al
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker, Christina Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC et al
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker, Christina Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00908
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, James Blackard, Michael Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox et al v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2008cv00379
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox, Donnie White and Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Kelly Rhodes, Rakesh Chandre, Marvin Powers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knox et al v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2008cv00277
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox, Donnie D White and Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Kelly Rhodes, Rakesh Chandre, Marvin Powers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knox v. Garlik et al
as 1:2008cv01081
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
John Garlik, A Angus, Christine Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knox et al v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2008cv01777
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox, Donnie White and Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Kelly Rhodes, Rakesh Chandre, Marvin Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2007cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
Kelly Rhodes, Rakesh Chandra, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
