Cases 41 - 50 of 5,781
Lella et al v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Vito Lella and Alex Xenidis
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James Foster, Todd Headley and others
Cahill, et al. v. NIKE, Inc.
as 24-2199
Plaintiff:
KELLY CAHILL, HEATHER HENDER, SARA JOHNSTON and others
Intervenor:
INSIDER INC., ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA, LLC and AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS
Defendant:
NIKE, INC.
Molo v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, The et al
as 1:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
The Colorado Max RE Trust II Acting By, Through, and With Its Trustee, Steven Molo
Defendant:
The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin of the State of Colorado, Patti Clapper, Francie Jacober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Water Street Gaming LLC v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Water Street Gaming LLC d/b/a Rainbow Club, Kelly Reyes and Culinary Workers Union Local 226
Plaintiff:
Water Street Gaming LLC doing business as Rainbow Club
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Neil v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul O'Neil
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd Headley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
