Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Slayton v. Harris County, TX et al
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Harris County, TX, Katrina Comacho, Ms. O and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03114
Petitioner:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slayton v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv02705
Petitioner:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slayton v. Bruce
as 4:2023cv02492
Petitioner:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Respondent:
Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Slayton v. Cheadle
as 23-20240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant / Appellee:
William Kauper Cheadle, also known as Bill, Cheadle Law Firm, District Court Room 482 Judge Maritza Antu and others
Slayton v. Spells et al
as 4:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
P. Spells, Sgt C. Roach, Lt. I. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Day et al
as 4:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Christopher Day, Gregory Eugene Hunter and Manvel Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Nguyen et al
as 4:2022cv04431
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Ryan Nguyen, Kim Ogg and Harris County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Cheadle et al
as 4:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
William Kauper Cheadle, Cheadle Law Firm, District Court Room 482 Judge Maritza Antu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Grace
as 22-20553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant / Appellee:
Joshua Bernard Grace, Doctor Jeffery Lewis, Houston Area Masonic Lodge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
