Cases 41 - 50 of 1,029
Ronald Martinez v. D. Baughman, et al
as 22-16750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BAUGHMAN, Associate Director CDCR at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, S. ALFARO, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento, G. JAIME, Associate Director CDCR (A) at CDCR Headquarters in Sacramento and others
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anibal Silva v. Midland Mortgage, et al
as 22-55819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANIBAL SILVA
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDLAND MORTGAGE, MIDFIRST BANK, KEN CLARK and others
Oscar Cabrera v. Ken Clark
as 22-16319
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR AMEZCUA CABRERA
Respondent / Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Jason William Brokken v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 5:2022cv01526
Petitioner:
Jason William Brokken
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Brokken v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Petitioner:
Jason William Brokken
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huy Tran v. Ken Clark
as 22-55798
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUY TRONG TRAN
Respondent / Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Devonte Harris v. E. Silva, et al
as 22-16279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
E. SILVA, Associate Warden at CSP Corcoran, A. PEDERSON, Correctional Captain at CSP Corcoran, MATTA, Correctional Counselor II at CSP Corcoran and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
