Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,017
Sipple Bey et al v. Meyer et al
as 5:2024cv04015
Plaintiff: Gary Sipple Bey and Annette Sipple
Defendant: William Meyer, Brian Hill, G. Jeffrey Records, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Smith v. Clark
as 24-2277
Petitioner: LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent: KEN CLARK, Warden
Torres v. Clark
as 24-1946
Petitioner: MACARIO TORRES
Respondent: KEN CLARK
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-1742
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JACE
Defendant: MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner: NATHAN HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-372
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL JACE
Defendant / Appellee: MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2023cv02845
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ardds v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Antoine L. Ardds
Defendant: Ken Clark, D. Hicks, D. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sipple et al v. Meyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv04108
Plaintiff: Gary Sipple, Annette Sipple and Annette Evon Jeter Trust
Defendant: Willam H. Meyer, Southlaw P.C. LLC, Greg Shaefer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weissman v. Clark
as 23-4407
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN IRVING WEISSMAN
Respondent / Appellee: KEN CLARK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?