Cases 1 - 10 of 720
(PC) Ardds v. Clark et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Ardds
Defendant:
Ken Clark, D. Hicks, D. Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2023cv02845
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hatchett v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Fisher Investment Group, Franklin Templeton Investment Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milorad Olic v. Ken Clark
as 2:2023cv03104
Petitioner:
Milorad Olic
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley H Solvey v. Ken Clark
as 2:2023cv00745
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Solvey v. Clark
as 1:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Solvey v. Clark
as 1:2022cv01634
Petitioner:
Stanley H. Solvey
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 3:2022cv07502
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Figueroa v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
