Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Novack v. Jeske et al
as 3:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Kelly Novack
Defendant:
Ken Jeske and Forest Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Allen et al
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Joshua Louis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Allen, Kate Brown, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 23-35298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, KEN JESKE, SHAWN HAYWOOD and others
Flores v. Hanley et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Richard James Flores
Defendant:
Acting Superintendent James Hanley, Security Manager J. Jorgensen, Lieutenant K. Pohlschneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobue v. Steward et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Zachary Michael Lobue
Defendant:
Heidi Steward, Colette Peters, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. ODOC et al
as 2:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Flores
Defendant:
ODOC, OCE, Melanie Doolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 22-35500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, RUMSEY, Captain, KEN JESKE and others
Mounce v. Vitt et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Mounce
Defendant:
Paul Charles Vitt, Tim Causey, Mike Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Maney, et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-80033
Respondent:
PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF OREGON, KATE BROWN, COLETTE PETERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
