Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-West et al
as 2:2009cv07508
Plaintiff:
Emhart Industries, Inc., Emhart Industries, Inc., Emhart Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Promotional Events, Inc.-West, Astro Pyrotechnics, Astro Pyrotechnics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
City of Rialto et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2009cv07501
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Edward Stout as the Trustee of the Stout-Rodriguez Family, Edward Stout, Linda Fredericksen as Trustee of The E.F. Schulz Trust and others
Cross Defendant:
Zambelli Fireworks Company, Rialto Concrete Products, Inc., Goodrich Corporation and others
Defendant:
Wong Chung Ming, Thomas O. Peters, Ken Thompson, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mary Callagy, City of Colton, Does 1-10 and others
Counter Defendant:
Ehmart Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Rialto and Rialto Utility Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
City of Colton v. American Promotional Events Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01864
3Rd Party Defendant:
E.T.I. Explosive Technologies International, Inc. of California, Does 1-10, Survival Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Goodrich Corporation and Rialto Utility Authority
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Astro Pyrotechnics Inc, Astro Pyrotechnics, John Callagy and others
Cross Defendant:
Rialto Concrete Products Inc, Linda Fredericksen as Trustee of The Michelle Ann Pointon Trust Under Trust Agreement Dated February 15, 1985, Kwikset Locks Inc and others
Defendant:
Mildred Wilkins, County of San Bernardino, Pyro Spectaculars Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Kwikset Corporation, Stephen Callagy, Linda Fredericksen as Trustee of The Walter M. Pointon Trust Dated and others
Counter Defendant:
Emhart Industries, Inc. and Whittaker Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Kwikset Locks, Inc., Ensign-Bickford Company, Thomas O. Peters Revocable Trust and others
Trustee:
Jimmy Chi Ho Wong
Special Master:
Venetta S Tassopulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Goodrich Corporation v. Chung Ming Wong et al
as 2:2009cv06630
Cross Defendant:
Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co., United States Department of Defense, American Promotional Events Inc - West and others
Plaintiff:
Goodrich Corporation
Defendant:
Chung Ming Wong, Tung Chun Company, United States of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ensign-Bickford Company, General Dynamics Corporation, Ordnace Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00269
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Michael Blomquist v. Washington Mutual, et al
as 08-16910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLOMQUIST, DBA Michael Scott Properties, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, a Washington corporation, KERRY KILLINGER, JOSEPH W. SAUNDERS and others
Urzua v. World Savings et al
as 3:2007cv05931
Plaintiff:
Luz-Maria Urzua
Defendant:
World Savings and Ken Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Urzua v. World Savings et al
as 4:2007cv05931
Plaintiff:
Luz-Maria Urzua
Defendant:
World Savings, Ken Thompson and US Vessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Anchante-Martinetti v. World Savings et al
as 3:2007cv05929
Plaintiff:
Cesar Anchante-Martinetti
Defendant:
World Savings, Ken Thompson and President
3rd Party Plaintiff:
Cesar Anchante-Martinetti
3rd Party Defendant:
World Savings, Ken Thompson and President
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blomquist v. Washington Mutual et al
as 5:2007cv04108
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Blomquist doing business as Michael Scott Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Washington Mutual, Kerry Killinger, Joseph W Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
