Cases 1 - 10 of 20
GAINES v. IX-XXIV-MCMLXXXIV
as 1:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
KENDRA ELAINE GAINES
Defendant:
IX-XXIV-MCMLXXXIV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWMAN v. SAVAGE et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
JOHN ELI BOWMAN
Defendant:
KENDRA SAVAGE, JONATHAN SCHULLER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OKEREKE v. BURROUGHS et al
as 1:2021cv00230
Defendant:
KEVIN M. SULLIVAN, KATHERINE N. GALLE, MICHAEL B. BARKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BRANTLEY v. USA
as 1:2020cv01264
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KENDRA BRANTLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HARRIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00931
Plaintiff:
KENDRA HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS v. JENKINS et al
as 1:2019mc00041
Defendant:
VALUE CREATORS, INC., ROYALL JENKINS, VALUE CREATORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRA ROSS
ZAMBON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
as 1:2018cv02065
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. BROWN, DANIEL GUBLER, MARK ZAMBON and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
DAVENPORT v. FAMILY MATTERS OF GREATER WASHINGTON, INC.
as 1:2018cv00922
Plaintiff:
KENDRA DAVENPORT
Defendant:
FAMILY MATTERS OF GREATER WASHINGTON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
KIM v. EISNER et al
as 1:2017cv00803
Plaintiff:
OK CHA KIM
Defendant:
LORI JOY EISNER , KENDRA YOUNG AUSBY , W. MICHEL PIERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
