Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 4:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wade Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean, Wanda Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean and Wanda Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Hopkins County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Wesley Allen Bingham
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean, Lewis Tatum, Hopkins County Jailors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berman v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Berman
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
West Coast Life Insurance Company v. Martin et al
as 4:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
West Coast Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean Martin and Wade Allen Delk
Cross_claimant:
Wade Allen Delk
Cross_defendant:
Kenneth Dean Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West Coast Life Insurance Company v. Martin et al
as 4:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
West Coast Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean Martin and Wade Allen Delk
Cross_claimant:
Wade Allen Delk
Cross_defendant:
Kenneth Dean Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zollicoffer v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03037
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Zollicoffer
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Ralph Bales, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00434
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00433
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00435
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
