Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Adeclat v. Kent Security Services, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60181
Plaintiff:
MILIENNE ADECLAT
Defendant:
Kent Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
ADECLAT v. Kent Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20406
Plaintiff:
MILIENNE ADECLAT
Defendant:
Kent Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Bishop v. Dalton Kent Securities Group, Inc.
as 1:2021cv08957
Petitioner:
LEVANT MIGUEL BISHOP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
DALTON KENT SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207
Moleon et al v. Alston et al
as 1:2021cv01398
Plaintiff:
Frantz Moleon
Defendant:
Ronald Manning, Kent Security Of New York, Inc., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv61976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hart v. Kent Security Services Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03701
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Hart
Defendant:
Kent Security Services Inc and Florida Integrated Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haughton v. Kent Security of Palm Beach, Inc.
as 9:2014cv80393
Plaintiff:
Mitzie Haughton
Defendant:
Kent Security of Palm Beach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv60631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patrick Hurley v. Kent of Naples, Inc., et al
as 13-10298
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICK HURLEY
Defendant - Appellant:
KENT OF NAPLES, INC., a Florida Corporation, KENT SECURITY OF PALM BEACH, INC., a Florida Corporation, KENT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a Florida Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
