Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service Commission
as 3:2022cv00063
Plaintiff: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant: Kentucky Public Service Commission, Kent A. Chandler and Mary Pat Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foresight Coal Sales, LLC. v. Kent Chandler, et al
as 21-6069
Plaintiff / Appellant: FORESIGHT COAL SALES, LLC.
Defendant / Appellee: KENT CHANDLER, in his official capacity as Chairman and Commissioner of Kentucky Public Service Commission, AMY D. CUBBAGE, in her official capacity as Vice Chairman and Commissioner of Kentucky Public Service Commission, MARIANNE BUTLER, in her official Capacity as Commissioner of Kentucky Public Service Commission and others
Foresight Coal Sales, LLC. v. Michael Schmitt, et al
as 20-5549
Defendant / Appellee: TALINA MATHEWS, In Official Capacity as Commissioner of Kentucky Public Service Commission, KENT CHANDLER, In Official Capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Public Service Commission, MICHAEL J. SCHMITT, In Official Capacity as Chairman and Commissioner of Kentucky Public Service Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FORESIGHT COAL SALES, LLC.
Ballard Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation, Inc. et al v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00058
Plaintiff: Ballard Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation, Inc. , Brandenburg Telephone Company , Duo County Telephone Cooperative Corporation, Inc. and others
Defendant: BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff: BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant: Halo Wireless, Inc.
Intervenor_defendant: David L. Armstrong , James W. Gardner , Charles R. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Halo Wireless, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00059
Plaintiff: BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC
Defendant: Halo Wireless, Inc.
Intervenor_defendant: David L. Armstrong , James W. Gardner , Charles R. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bellsouth Telecommunications, v. Kentucky Public Service Commis, et al
as 10-6416
Plaintiff - Appellant: BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DAVID L. ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as Chairman of the PSC, JAMES W. GARDNER, in his official capacity as Vice Chairman of the PSC and others
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service Commission et al
as 3:2010cv00075
Plaintiff: BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Defendant: Kentucky Public Service Commission, David L. Armstrong, James W. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connie Marshall v. Jeff Derouen, et al
as 10-5462
Plaintiff - Appellant: CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee: JEFF DEROUEN, Individual/Official Capacity, DAVID L. ARMSTRONG, Individual/Official Capacity, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and others
Bellsouth Telecommunications, v. Kentucky Public Service Commis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5311
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., dba AT&T Kentucky
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DAVID L. ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission, JAMES W. GARDNER, in his official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Public Service Commission and others
Bellsouth Telecommunications, v. Kentucky Public Service Commis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5310
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., dba AT&T Kentucky
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee: KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DAVID L. ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission, JAMES W. GARDNER, in his official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Public Service Commission and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?