Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Charles R Jones
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Kevin Bovenkamp, Louis Sowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv05180
Plaintiff:
Dranoel Enaj Brown
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, Care Review Committee, Brienne Alexi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Washington State Department of Corrections, et al.
as 4:2017cv05110
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections , Kevin Bovenkamp and John and Jane 1-20 Does
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED FILED IN WRONG COUNTY
as 2:2017cv00268
Defendant:
State of Washington and Kevin Bovenkamp
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClane v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv05062
Plaintiff:
Stephen Paul McClane
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kevin Bovenkamp, Peter Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pacholke et al
as 2:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Defendant:
Dan Pacholke, Bernard Warner, Kevin Bovenkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guthrie v. Vale et al
as 4:2015cv05106
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Guthrie
Defendant:
Eldon Vale, Donald Holbrook, Brent Caulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Adams et al
as 4:2015cv05095
Plaintiff:
William Womack
Defendant:
L Adams, Kevin Bovenkamp, B Braid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baumgardner v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Troy L Baumgardner
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Bernard Warner, Earl X Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holtz v. Phillips et al
as 4:2014cv05018
Plaintiff:
Ronald Holtz
Defendant:
Joella Phillips , Peter Beck , Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
